Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff: ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant: WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEAD v. DECKARD et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff: Dean Arthur Mead
Defendant: B. Deckard Officer, BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Monroe County Sheriff Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SLOWN
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant: L. SLOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SLOWN et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant: L. SLOWN, K. LEEK, NOAH ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SIMONE et al
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff: GREGORY W. BROWN
Defendant: SIMONE, FISH, ARTHUR NYEAYEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Carter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff: John Arthur Bridges, Jr and John Bridges
Defendant: Robert E Carter, Jr, William Hyatte and Tera K Klutz
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Petitioner: MICHAEL ARTHUR ALLEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UPSHAW v. DIEKHOFF et al
as 2:2021cv00341
Plaintiff: JERMAINE UPSHAW
Defendant: MARY ELLEN DIEKHOFF, CARL ARTHUR SALZMANN and KEN BUGLAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ARTHUR ALLEN
Defendant: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?