Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Robinson v. Mosley et al
as 6:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robinson
Defendant:
Jammie Mosley, Laurel County, APRN Chastity King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydnor v. Todd County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
John Sydnor, Micah Thompson and Louis Taylor
Defendant:
Todd County Jail, Jeff Penick and Arthur Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Penick et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Penick and Arthur Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
