Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beggs v. Mason
as 1:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
Forrest Arthur Beggs
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Snaza
as 3:2022cv05566
Petitioner:
Arthur L Austin and Arthur Lenard Austin
Respondent:
John D Snaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Snaza
as 3:2022cv05568
Petitioner:
Arthur L Austin and Arthur Lenard Austin
Respondent:
John D Snaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Snaza
as 3:2022cv05567
Petitioner:
Arthur Lenard Austin
Respondent:
John Snaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallagher v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv05434
Petitioner:
Jaymes Arthur Gallagher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Uttecht
as 3:2022cv05371
Plaintiff:
Martin Arthur Jones and Martin A Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Van Ogle et al
as 3:2021cv05818
Plaintiff:
Christopher Arthur Miller
Defendant:
Dan Van Ogle, Jeneva Cotton, Scott Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
as 2:2021cv00217
Petitioner:
Don Arthur Moore
Respondent:
Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinnon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv05097
Plaintiff:
Arthur McKinnon
Defendant:
Michael Wayman, Lisa J Flynn, Elizabeth Hainline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
