Cases 1 - 10 of 44,771
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Ryan Hughes, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Barkley et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Glen Torres
Defendant:
Officer Barkley, Officer Frye, Nurse Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French et al v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Marcellus French, Allen Ford, Nicholas Ayala and others
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Sterrett, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Jacobs v. David et al
as 5:2024cv11463
Plaintiff:
William Edwin Jacobs
Defendant:
David, Frangedakis, Branch and others
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Robert Maciol, Patternoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
