Cases 1 - 10 of 30,594
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Rolle v. USA
as 5:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Steven Rolle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Palacio v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02118
Petitioner:
Jairo Palacio Palacio
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
LANCE SAMUEL GRAVES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hendon v. Hayes et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Valchic Wendell Hendon
Defendant:
FNU Hayes, FNU Baker, FNU Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Safrit v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02116
Petitioner:
Matthew A. Safrit and Matthews Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03155
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Edward F. Basden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Walsh et al
as 5:2024ct03154
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
Sergeant Walsh, Correctional Officer Sculley, Sergeant Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckham v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Dayshawn Beckham
Respondent:
Mecklenburg County, Gary L. McFadden, Ashley Nicole Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hebert v. USA
as 5:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Wayne Francis Hebert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
