Cases 1 - 10 of 82
NARANJO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
ISAAC NARANJO
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, PA ATT. GENERAL, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Romain v. Kieselowsky et al
as 3:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Steven Romain
Defendant:
Matthew Kieselowsky, Dr. Dan Galvan, Jane Doe Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01890
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, S. BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chirinos v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Obed Isaac Chirinos
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Payne v. Faith et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joshua Isaac Payne
Defendant:
Walter Faith, B. Mason, L. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
ISAAC BILAL PEARSON and ISSAC BILAL PEARSON
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC W. TICE, Sergeant WOZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NARANJO v. IVICIC et al
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
D. J. CLOSE, M.J. PYO, M.M. IVICIC and others
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00342
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Isaac v. Marsh et al
as 1:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Z.N. Hammers, Major Curtis Grice, Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
