Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Bland
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
Estella Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. USA
as 6:2024cv06041
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donnerson v. Crittenden County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnerson
Defendant:
Crittenden County Detention Center, Jeffery Thomas, T Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Shook
as 2:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Truman Keith
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brister v. Payne
as 4:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Jeffery H Brister
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
