Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honaker v. Lincoln County Jail
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Shannon Doyle Honaker
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covell et al v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Covell, Cameron Malugin, Chuck Whitehead and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Joey Parks, Jeff Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 1:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Lester Doyle and Lester Paul Doyle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Anthony Alexander, Shelby Co. Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pippin v. Carter County Detention Center (PSLC2)
as 2:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Pippin
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Doyle et al
as 2:2018cv02343
Plaintiff:
Joshua Charles Dunlap
Defendant:
Ashley Doyle, Keisha Curry, Kaneisha Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Doyle A Whitlock
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Harris, et al.
as 2:2018cv02058
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Defendant:
Patrick Harris, Elizabeth Watson, Famous Hurdle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
