Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mason v. Cooley
as 2:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
Jack Alexander Mason
Respondent:
Keith Cooley and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews et al v. Lo et al
as 2:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Matthews, Frank William Beckendorf, III and Frank W. Beckendorf, III
Defendant:
William Lo, J. Ham, Aaron Mendow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ahmond Mason and Ahomond Mason
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Woods, Warden Dauzat, Rapides Parish Detention Center I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Cooley
as 2:2019cv09313
Defendant:
Warden Keith Cooley
Plaintiff:
Jack Alexander Mason
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mason v. Vannoy
as 5:2016cv00570
Plaintiff:
James E Mason, Jr
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mason v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2016cv00205
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish Prison Sheriff Office, Sid J. Gautreaux, III and Dennis Grimes
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2014cv02411
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 3:2013cv00097
Defendant:
Mason Hunter and John Sanders
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Keller
as 2:2012cv02820
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Mason
Defendant:
J A Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mason v. Rogers et al
as 3:2012cv00613
Plaintiff:
Olivia Mason
Defendant:
Unknown Moore and Jim Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
