Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips v. South Bend Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
South Bend Indiana, Indiana The State of, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattingly v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Corey Mattingly
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Kenneth Gann and Stephen Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jayme Smith and Jayme Lee Smith
Defendant:
Coltin Clark, Patty Clouse, Lind L Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv02978
Plaintiff:
JAYME SMITH
Defendant:
COLTIN CLARK, PATTY CLOUSE, LIND L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malerich v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00437
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, J Rodman, Oscar Martinez, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Malerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLuna v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DeLuna
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez Jr, Former Sheriff John Buncich, Former Assistant Deputy Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford Heth v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Lunsford Heth
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Assistant Warden Nearly, Correctional Officer Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAD-MATTINGLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00572
Petitioner:
BRETT A. HEAD-MATTINGLY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATTINGLY v. BERTRAM
as 4:2015cv00177
Defendant:
BEN BERTRAM
Plaintiff:
SHAUN MATTHEW MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
