Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Powers-Ivey v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powers-Ivey and Tyrone Powres-Ivey
Defendant:
R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. RILEY et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN POWERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE RILEY, MONICA GIBSON, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY INDIANA JAIL
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE POWERS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY INDIANA JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
GENARO GARCIA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, ASHLEY PARIDO, JASON POWERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Evan Rollins
Defendant:
Johnson, Ray Pholtz, Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. RICE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JOHN POWERS, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
