Cases 1 - 10 of 23
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. USA
as 4:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PAYNE v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
LEMONTE E. PAYNE
Defendant:
IDOC, PRATT and HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Robert Omer Pratt, Jr, Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert O Pratt
Defendant:
Indiana State of, LaPorte County IN, Frasican Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pratt v. Logansport Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
Rex Alan Pratt
Defendant:
Logansport Police Department, Bryce Hall, Jonathan Flory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. LaPorte County of et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr and Rev. Robert Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Hagler, Holt, Allen W Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. LaPorte County et al
as 3:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Walker, Longski, Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Society et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
LaPorte County Metro Operations, LaPorte City Police Department, Nigel Albaneze and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00394
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
DeParris Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
