Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Calton v. Wolfe
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Allen F Calton
Defendant:
Judge Chris Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Brannon et al
as 6:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Washington
Defendant:
CO Erik Brannon, CO Sylvanus Umebali, CO Christopher Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Damian Briggs
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant(s), Ms Hawkins, Cpt Trotman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner:
Joseph F. Jean
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. Salazar et al
as 5:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nicky Pena
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar, Dr. F and University Hospital Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Trochesset et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriff Henry Trochesset, Gale Lilliman, H.C.A. (Hospital) Houston Mainland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
