Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
RONNIE ARCHER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL (THEODORE ROKITA), COMMISSIONER (CHRISTINA REAGLE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, K Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUICK v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
DANNY QUICK
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DAVIS
Defendant:
IDOC, MRS. QUICK, MRS. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaulden v. Fries et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Trent Gaulden
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Aaron Quick, Vance Pruden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kegley v. Ray et al
as 1:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kegley
Defendant:
Chad Ray, Aaron Quick, Craig Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Quick et al
as 1:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Louis R Lawson
Defendant:
Officer Quick, Officer Schemmler, Officer Brenneke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRESCHER v. QUICK et al
as 3:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY DRESCHER
Defendant:
CHRIS QUICK, TERRY MCWILLIAMS and BILL WAMPLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
