Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WRIGHT v. FEDDER et al
as 2:2023cv05099
Plaintiff:
SEAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER FEDDER, COIII FONDI, NURSE (DAN) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAINBRIDGE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv04835
Plaintiff:
BRUCE BAINBRIDGE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TAMMIE FERGUSON, JOHN TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STYLES v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2023cv03755
Plaintiff:
TYREEK STYLES
Defendant:
WARDEN ORTIZ, WARDEN MARLER, CAPTAIN NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STYLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv05087
Plaintiff:
TYREEK STYLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STYLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv05187
Plaintiff:
TYREEK STYLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STYLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03460
Plaintiff:
TYRONE STYLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEARL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2012cv01793
Plaintiff:
RONALD ANDERSON PEARL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, GOSPEL RAP, HIP HOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STYLES v. NORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
NORMAN J. STYLES
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BISHOP, ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2010cv02513
Plaintiff:
PROSEM WAGNER, JAMAL BENNETT, BRANDON JONES and others
Defendant:
JULIO ALGARIN, DENNIS MOLYNOUX, JAMES FRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STYLES v. PALAKOVICH et al
as 2:2009cv02412
Petitioner:
MAURICE A. STYLES
Respondent:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
