Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watkins v. Hardy et al
as 5:2023ct03062
Plaintiff:
Van Brett Pierre Watkins, Sr. and Van Brett Watkins
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hardy, Nurse Tanya Pitterford, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. The County of Buncombe County et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Judd
Defendant:
The County of Buncombe County, Jack Van Duncan, Tina Cox Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Vance County et al
as 5:2022ct03409
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland and Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
Vance County, City of Henderson, W.E. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Defendant:
K. Goodwin, C. Smith, FNU Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Boxer et al
as 5:2021ct03211
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Captain Boxer, Lt. Mosley, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Moore
as 5:2021ct03192
Plaintiff:
Russell Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Sgt. D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03178
Plaintiff:
Antain Jerrod Watkins
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
