Cases 1 - 10 of 706
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Settles
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hess #353733 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Greg John Hess
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Cochise, County of, Cochise County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarango v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Tarango
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Buckeye, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Luis Zavalza Sanchez
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benitez v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Piero Benitez
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Christy v. Gutierrez
as 4:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Shawn R Christy
Respondent:
M Gutierrez and B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams #200957 v. Medrano et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lamont M Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Medrano, Unknown Freetag, B Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montes-Chavez v. Heisner et al
as 2:2023cv02523
Petitioner:
Jason Trinidad Montes-Chavez
Respondent:
RA Heisner, B Birkholz and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Latham #152032 v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv02429
Plaintiff:
Tomas Latham
Defendant:
B Gibson and Mark T Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv02069
Petitioner:
Lester Jose Salazar
Respondent:
B Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
