Cases 1 - 10 of 891
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv01241
Defendant:
Diana K, Katina Crossby and Ebony C Tucker
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv01067
Petitioner:
Tara Lynn Lee
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodyard v. Mack et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office Nurse D, Baldwin County Sheriff's Office Nurse C, Hoss Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Defendant:
Paul C Johnson, Roderick Gadsen and Derrick Dent
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Washington et al
as 5:2024cv00722
Defendant:
Erika Washington, Alabama, State of, Ebony C. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Defendant:
John Hamm, C. Simpson, Michael Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2024cv00656
Respondent:
Mark Pettway
Petitioner:
Darryl C Foreman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
