Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hueston v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
David E. Hueston
Respondent:
R. Brown and Dr. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carroll v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walker Carroll
Defendant:
James E. Carroll, Sgt. Gibson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Pamela Givens, Sandra May, Shirley Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Honaker v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gerald Leon Honaker
Defendant:
Sgt. W. E. Rose, Dep. J. A. Brooks, Dep. M. S. Altice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter-EL v. Ray et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
George E. Carter-EL
Respondent:
H.L. Ray and Mr. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
