Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DOMINICK v. BEVINO
as 1:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MARIO DWAYNE DOMINICK
Defendant:
CORRECTION S OFFICER BEVINO, CORRECTIONS OFFICER RIDER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GOULD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GOULD v. ADAMS
as 2:2021cv00537
Respondent:
MELINDA ADAMS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
CARL GOULD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABLE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00105
Defendant:
MS. TRACY SHAWLEY, BRIAN HENDERSON, ADAM CRUMB and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE D. ABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GALBIATI v. KULIGK et al
as 1:2019cv00021
Defendant:
SERGEANT IMHOFF, LIEUTENANT KULIGK, HAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL P. GALBIATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GALBIATI v. KULIGK et al
as 2:2019cv00116
Defendant:
SERGEANT IMHOFF, LIEUTENANT KULIGK, HAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL P. GALBIATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WEEDON v. GODLEWSKI et al
as 2:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WEEDON
Defendant:
GODLEWSKI, MARY CANINO, MIKE WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COULSON v. HUMES et al
as 1:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. COULSON
Defendant:
CRYSTAL HUMES and SUSAN GOULD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTON v. HARKLEROAD et al
as 2:2013cv01109
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WALTON
Defendant:
HARKLEROAD, RAMBLER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. MCBRIDE et al
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCOTT
Defendant:
MCBRIDE, LINDSEY, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
