Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Bayless
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Alphonso Jones
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00364
Petitioner:
Alton Jones
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Respondent:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. US Marshal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Eric Day
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia Regional Jail Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. United States
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Sharp
Defendant:
Lt. C. Looney, Officer Specialist B. Jones, Correctional Officer Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
