Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. Buttram et al
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Tol Shelby Shropshire
Defendant:
Dean Buttram, Vernon Ambry, Randle Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell and Keith Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Erick Lindsey
Defendant:
Investigator James Mickey Young, Keith Cox and Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Mickey Young, Keith Cox, Jordan Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Brandon et al
as 5:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leavert Kendrell McKinney
Defendant:
Jordan D Brandon, John R Chandler and Stephen Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Carter et al
as 7:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ashley Waller
Defendant:
Captain Carter, Warden Gordy, staff attorney 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
