Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Leahy v. Wells et al
as 8:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Jesse Bryon Leahy
Defendant:
Rick Wells and YesCare Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leahy v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00868
Petitioner:
Christopher Leahy and Christopher L Leahy
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leahy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Rachael Natalie Leahy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEAHY v. BUSCHER
as 4:2023cv00397
Petitioner:
Rachael Leahy and RACHAEL NATALIE LEAHY
Respondent:
Jerry Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gee v. Shamon et al
as 1:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Gee
Defendant:
D. Shamon, J. Leahy and Beamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) King v. Leahy
as 1:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
J. Leahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Singh v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Defendant:
Jim Cooper and Aaron Leahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kern v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
James Kern
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, A. Leahy, Tamira Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
