Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. USA
as 4:2023cv01217
Petitioner:
Isaac May
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
May v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv04094
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen May
Defendant:
Sergeant Hines, Sergeant Eleely and Sergeant Yeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Parnell R May
Defendant:
M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04094
Plaintiff:
Justin Morrow
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunn v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bunn
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04085
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Charles Stafford
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
