Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Belton L Rowe
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuykendall v. Durazo et al
as 3:2022cv08008
Plaintiff:
George Kuykendall
Defendant:
Unknown Durazo, Unknown Mukora, Unknown Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Mills, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Learner, Unknown Rowe and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitko #330785 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Thomas Staab, Donna Mendoza, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Frank G Kitko, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Von Blankensee
as 4:2020cv00224
Respondent:
Unknown Von Blankensee
Petitioner:
Cory M Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis #205781 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2019cv04946
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Andreas Thude and Rhazzle Rowe
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #197527 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02657
Defendant:
Unknown Moore, Unknown Rowe, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Vaughn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benge #137719 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Benge
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Christine A Sparacino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv00944
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan , Michael Adu-Tutu and others
Movant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
