Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ADCOCK v. CRICKMAR
as 5:2014cv00372
Petitioner:
JOHN T ADCOCK
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ponder v. Paulk et al
as 7:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Godfrey Lafayette Ponder
Defendant:
Ashley Paulk, Michelle Keene, Staff Sergeant Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Warnock et al
as 7:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
Travis A Woods
Defendant:
Officer Warnock, Josh Adcock, Michelle Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Keene et al
as 7:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Walter Everett Moore, III
Defendant:
Michelle Keene, Sgt. James, Sheriff Prine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Stewart et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Eddie J. King
Defendant:
Kenneth Stewart, Eric Adcock, Brian Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Stewart et al
as 1:2008cv03681
Plaintiff:
Eddie J. King
Defendant:
Kenneth Stewart, Eric Adcock, Brian Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fendley v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis Fendley
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Jenny Adcock, Len Wood and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adcock v. Nelson
as 1:2008cv02251
Petitioner:
Elijah Matthew Adcock
Respondent:
Cynthia M. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann et al v. Donald et al
as 7:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Astaniel Jarvis Mann, Pip Heng, Elijah Adcock and others
Defendant:
James Donald, Rick Jacobs, Sarah Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
