Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kenny Alexander
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Hamm (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Perkins and Emmanuel Alexander Perkins
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armmer v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01562
Petitioner:
Alexander Joseph Armmer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Calloway et al
as 2:2022cv00882
Petitioner:
Demitrius Wayne Alexander
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Warden Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. USA
as 1:2022cv00249
Petitioner:
Rodney Lorenzo Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cropper v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Vaughn Alexander Cropper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexander v. Hines et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
Demitrius Wayne Alexander
Defendant:
Derrick Hines, Captain Smith and Officer Myrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Cox et al
as 7:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alexander McCoy
Defendant:
Keith Booty Cox and J Chris McCool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
