Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Alferez v. Marshall et al
as 4:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Alferez
Defendant:
Unknown Marshall, Unknown Haight-Bieler, Unknown Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cobb v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00241
Defendant:
J Cox, V Ramsey, K Werner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Blanckensee et al
as 4:2020cv00370
Defendant:
T Schneider, G Shields, Ann Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Coty Travis Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00434
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Ann Ash
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinson v. Dukett et al
as 4:2019cv00422
Defendant:
J Karlan, Bureau of Prisons, J Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Unknown Williamson, B Combs, J Cox and others
Plaintiff:
William Richard Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weibel v. Alexander et al
as 4:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel John Ross Weibel
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, J Kelly, J Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rarey v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Rarey
Defendant:
United States of America, J Coyle and Ann Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
