Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lopez v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv23411
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Deacon et al
as 7:2023cv07327
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
J. T. Deacon, 4 John Does and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv22936
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estinfil v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Whendid Estinfil
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Miami-Dade County, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Anthony Lopez
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. Balaam
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
Darin Balaam, Barrett-Venn, J. Malewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. N.Y.C. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv03887
Defendant:
John Doe, N.Y.C. Department of Correction, Avon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. N.Y.C. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv03886
Defendant:
John Doe and N.Y.C. Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarema v. Monroe County Florida et al
as 4:2019cv10057
Defendant:
Director Kenna Allen, Sheriff Rick Ramsey, Monroe County Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas John Yarema
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
