Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Irick v. Mays
as 3:2018cv00737
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Interested Party:
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Irick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lassiter v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2018cv02304
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Lassiter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Shelby County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grogg v. Knoxville Criminal Court of Appeals
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Audie Grogg
Defendant:
Knoxville Criminal Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Public Defender's Office, Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schreane v. Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 1:2013cv00190
Petitioner:
Clarence D Schreane
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals and Supreme Court of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McClarty et al
as 3:2012cv01112
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
John W. McClarty, Herschel P. Franks, D. Michael Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ohldam et al
as 2:2011cv02355
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Bill Ohldam, Robert Moore, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00315
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Davis v. Odell et al
as 2:2008cv02692
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Davis
Defendant:
Patricia A. Odell, George H Brown, Sr., Tennessee, State Of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
