Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Yarborough v. Dance et al
as 5:2023ct03165
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Yarborough
Defendant:
Paula Dance and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Albemarle District Jail et al
as 5:2021ct03141
Defendant:
Dr. Daniel H. Lynam, Nurse Dakia, Ms. Phylis and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyrone Brown and Hunter Sean Kleintank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. ARAMARK CORRECTION SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, CAROL BOSHOLM, DAWN QUASHIE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00147
Defendant:
ROBERT DUSTINBURGER, OFC. ELMORE, ARAMARK and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM COUNTY DET. FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT PEELE, ARAMARK, MAJOR E. BAZMORE and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Allen et al
as 5:2012ct03225
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Officer Allen, Officer Haygwood, M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Pitt County Municipal Government et al
as 5:2012ct03145
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Municipal Government, Elks, Major Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID B. WILLIAMS, JAMIE MINOR, EQUITY BASED SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cherry v. Aramark Co. et al
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Cherry
Defendant:
Aramark Co., FNU Platt and T. Barie
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
