Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Armin Wand, III v. TextBehind
as 24-1076
Plaintiff:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant:
TEXTBEHIND, Third-Party Mail Vendor
Armin Wand, III v. TextBehind
as 23-3402
Plaintiff:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant:
TEXTBEHIND, Third-Party Mail Vendor
Armin Wand, III v. Becky Kramer
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant / Appellee:
BECKY KRAMER, also known as BECKEY KRAMER
Walker et al v. Monfils et al
as 1:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Marcellous L Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy L Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armin Wand, III v. Becky Kramer, et al
as 22-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant / Appellee:
BECKY KRAMER, also known as BECKEY KRAMER, LEONARD JOHNSON, JOLINDA WATERMAN, HSU Manager and others
Walker, Marcellous et al v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wand, Armin v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Logan Brown, Mark Kartman and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Armin Wand, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wand, Armin et al v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2018cv00520
Petitioner:
Armin Wand, III
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wand, Armin et al v. Wisconsin Secure Program Facility et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Defendant:
John E. Scarborough, MD, Becky Kramer, Wisconsin Secure Program Facility and others
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Armin Wand, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armin Wand, III v. D. Flannery, et al
as 15-2510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
D. FLANNERY, Supervising Officer and JERRY SWEENEY, Security Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
