Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayburn v. Potter et al
as 8:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Clifford R. Rayburn
Defendant:
Danny Potter, United States Marshals, et al, Omaha Police Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2021cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jason Dwinell and Et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaso v. Dawson County Sherriffs et al et al
as 4:2019cv03106
Defendant:
Dawson County Sherriffs et al, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Area, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Schlemat and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Jaso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. State of Nebraska, et al et al
as 8:2019cv00476
Respondent:
State of Nebraska, et al and Brad Johnson
Petitioner:
Yohan Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nooner v. State of Nebraska et. al.
as 8:2019cv00360
Defendant:
State of Nebraska et. al., Quinn Robert Eaton, Ms. Marnie Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner and Mr. Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, et al
as 4:2016cv03021
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, et al, D. T. Marshall and Reese Mckinney
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Dabbi v. USA
as 4:2008cv03074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Adil Gasim Al-Dabbi
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
