Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Eric Jerome Phillips, Jr. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv02428
Defendant:
Doe Defendant 1, Doe Defendant 3, Doe Defendant 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Phillips, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Jones, et al
as 2:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Clorenzo Mack Griffin
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Andris and Mattoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Defendant:
Sacramento, County of Sacramento, Scott Jones and others
Plaintiff:
(PC) Jones and Walter Olin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehmood v. Falk et al
as 2:2015cv00673
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Falk, O'Brien, Andris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Andris et al
as 2:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Andris, Massa, Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, Sacramento County Main Jail Superintendent, Terry Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Andris, et al.
as 2:2014cv01613
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Andris, U.S. Marshal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguirre v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv02165
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Aguirre
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Scott Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrys v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation Dental Department et al
as 3:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Jesse Aaron Andrys
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation Dental Department, C. Fransdal, W. J. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. Grounds et al
as 3:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Andrys Jesse Aaron
Defendant:
R. T.C. Grounds, Gibbs, E. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
