Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Superior Court of Gwinnett et al
as 1:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Superior Court of Gwinnett, Patsy Gatson and Gwinnett Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Superior Court Gwinnett Co et al
as 1:2021cv02531
Defendant:
Superior Court Gwinnett Co and District Attorney Patsy Gatson
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Guzman Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Guzman v. Meisner
as 2:2021cv00307
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO GUZMAN
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sakinah-Aliahmed v. Chief Justice Judge Leonard P. Stark et al
as 1:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Gabriel August, Timothy Hayes, Officer Gibbins and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly E. Sakinah-Aliahmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartholomew Guzman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20162
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARTHOLOMEW ANTONIO GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Guzman v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guzman-Valencia v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Pedro Antonio Guzman-Valencia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Antonio Castro-Guzman
as 14-56645
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO CASTRO-GUZMAN, AKA Anthony Castro, AKA Anthony Gonzales Castro, AKA Antonio Castro, AKA Antonio Guzman Castro, AKA Guzman Anthony Castro, AKA Anthony Castro-Guzman
Raul Guzman-Dearco v. USA
as 13-13882
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL ANTONIO GUZMAN-DEARCO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
