Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Smith et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veitch v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00448
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Veitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiarizio v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lynn Dixon and Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Gordy et al
as 4:2018cv00767
Petitioner:
Larry Gwen Coker
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cathey v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv01062
Petitioner:
Daveon L Cathey
Respondent:
Leon Bolling and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2014cv01984
Petitioner:
Paul Thomas
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Headley, Board of Pardons and Paroles (State of Alabama) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Billips et al
as 6:2014cv01907
Petitioner:
Troy H. Smith
Respondent:
Phyllis Billips and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zaner v. Gordon et al
as 1:2014cv01398
Petitioner:
Johnathan W. Zaner
Respondent:
Gordon and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01386
Petitioner:
Larry Joe Jordan
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
