Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Shortymacknifisent et al v. Beltz et al
as 0:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent and International Alfred Bilbo Gholson Church of Ministries, Incorporated, The
Defendant:
Tracy Beltz, Dane Swagger, Chad Mitsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 0:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, SSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Otto v. Schmitt et al
as 0:2021cv01610
Plaintiff:
DuWayne Wm. Otto
Defendant:
Barbara Schmitt, Mary Karl and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hari v. Smith et al
as 0:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Scott Hull, Rachel Clem, Thomas Huse and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. McMillen et al
as 0:2019cv02880
Defendant:
Marsha McMillen and Barbara J Harrington
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leventhal v. Tomford et al
as 0:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Leventhal
Defendant:
Travis Tomford, Victor Rigling, Rachel Mark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tepoel v. Conley et al
as 0:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Tepoel
Defendant:
William M. Conley, Jane Doe Conley, Barbara B. Crabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otto v. Roy et al
as 0:2014cv01347
Plaintiff:
DuWayne Wm Otto
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Joan Fabian, Barbara Schmit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
de la Garza v Roy et al
as 0:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cesar de la Garza
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Inc., Nanette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otto v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2013cv03428
Plaintiff:
DuWayne Wm Otto
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Joan Fabian, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
