Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Johnson v. Bonnet et al
as 3:2026cv01768
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
LT. Jonathan Michael Bonnet and LT. K. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Anudjar et al
as 8:2026cv01585
Plaintiff:
Deandre Lee Oliver
Defendant:
Officer Anudjar, Officer Rosa, Lieutenant B. Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Hatcher v. Kayra Davis, et al
as 26-11476
Plaintiff:
MARK EUGENE HATCHER
Defendant:
KAYRA DAVIS, DEVONTE DENNIS, RUSSEL C. TOLBERT and others
Hatcher v. Warden, Hardee Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2026cv00246
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Warden, Hardee Correctional Institution, C. Heiss, Kayla Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2026cv00019
Plaintiff:
Howard Stith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Chandra Carothers, Christina Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Fernandez v. Warden, MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2025cv05112
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn, Duvinka Jordan, Bonnet Claude-Luvier and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BONNET
as 2:2025cv06334
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANK BONNET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Davis et al
as 8:2025cv02615
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Kayra Davis, Correctional Officer Devonte Dennis, Correctional Officer Russel C Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akhnaten Casey v. J. Bonnet, et al
as 25-12228
Plaintiff:
AKHNATEN CASEY
Defendant:
J. BONNET, Sgt., J. GUZMAN, Correctional Officer, K. WHITE and others
Dean v. Blue Bonnet Detention Center
as 3:2024cv02555
Respondent:
Blue Bonnet Detention Center
Petitioner:
Sharoon Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
