Cases 1 - 10 of 18
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Warden Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ravan v. Benton et al
as 4:2020cv00267
Defendant:
Counselor Townsend, Capt Judkins, Dep Warden Betterson and others
Plaintiff:
John S Ravan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goswick v. Langford et al
as 1:2020cv00400
Plaintiff:
David Michael Goswick
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Thornton, Seargent John Doe Stucky, Lieutenant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Atwood, II v. Ben Ford, et al
as 15-60454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF BEN FORD, Former Sheriff of Covington County, SHERIFF STANN SMITH, Current Sheriff of Covington County, DEPUTY HOLBROOKE, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Atwood v. Ford et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Stann Smith, Holbrooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Travis Wynne Elmore
Defendant:
Ben Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poole v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Crawthorne Poole
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brian Patterson and Angie H. Deil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Keith McLaurin
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brain Patterson and Angie Dielh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
