Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Tyler v. Myers et al
as 4:2022cv03138
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Michael Myers and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, Daniel Birdsahl, Robert B. Evnen and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2018cv00030
Defendant:
City of Omaha, County of Douglas, State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Bride et al
as 4:2017cv03057
Defendant:
G. Bride, David Lopez, Douglas Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Lohaus et al
as 8:2017cv00012
Defendant:
Flynn, Etta Graves and Lohaus
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Nebraska
as 8:2016cv00388
Respondent:
Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2016cv00049
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2015cv00173
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Heavican et al
as 8:2012cv00363
Respondent:
Michael Heavican and Nebraskkk Supreme KKKourt
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Heavican et al
as 8:2012cv00277
Defendant:
Mike Heavican and Nebraskkk Supreme KKKourt, Nebrakkk
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
