Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Keith Alexander v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 22-2880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, KATHY BISCO, JUSTIN AGOSTA and others
Harris v. Biscoe et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Walter Harris
Defendant:
Lt. Biscoe, Michael Dunkle, Wesley Matrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. BISCOE et al
as 2:2022cv03310
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARRIS
Defendant:
MR. BISCOE, MICHAEL DUNKLE, WESLEY MATREY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Muhammad Leach v. Kathleen Biscoe, et al
as 22-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD LEACH
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN BISCOE, Corrections Unit Manager, ROBERT KELLEY, Corrections Food Service Manager, JACOB S. DAVIS, Correctional Food Service Instructor and others
Alexander v. McGinley et al
as 3:2020cv02226
Defendant:
Lindsay Nye, Thomas McGinley, Justin Agosta and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hineman v. Dolphe Briscoe Unit Staff et al
as 5:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Dolphe Biscoe Unit Staff, Lieutenant Luna and Dolph Briscoe Unit Staff
Plaintiff:
William D Hineman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hineman v. Dolphe Biscoe Unit Staff et al;
as 2:2020cv00258
Defendant:
Dolphe Biscoe Unit Staff and Lieutenant Luna
Plaintiff:
William D Hineman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leach v. Biscoe et al
as 4:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Neil Inch-Diorio, Robert W Kelley, Diane Daya and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 3:2020cv00618
Defendant:
SGT. RICIGLIANO, Valentine, Traci Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 2:2020cv00474
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER KELLNER, SGT. RICIGLIANO, TRACI JACOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
