Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Azize v. Bureau Of Citizenship and Immi
as 18-1429
Petitioner - Appellant:
William Azize
Respondent - Appellee:
Bureau Of Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Attorney General
Andre Juste v. Bureau of Citizenship and Imm, et al
as 17-5160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre Juste
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and Sally Quillian Yates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08340
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jean Merilien v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship and, et al
as 14-11152
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN, A # 29-363-451
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) and WARDEN
Abdallah v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02151
Petitioner:
Yasser Abdallah
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Department of Justice, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv15444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv11658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
