Cases 1 - 10 of 20
EARLS v. COLLINS et al
as 3:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND EARLS, III
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, BARR, TIPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. TRAFICANTE et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
ASHLEY TRAFICANTE, SETH ERICKSON, (FIRST NAME UNK.) CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
John E. Jones, Martin C. Carlson and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05574
Plaintiff:
CARLSON F. ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL BELL, CYNITHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppola v. Pigos et al
as 3:2016cv01857
Plaintiff:
Joseph Coppola
Defendant:
Kevin Pigos, Steve Brown, Martin C. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holtz v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02227
Plaintiff:
Tim E. Holtz
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc., George C. Zoley, Norman A Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARLSON v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv00849
Petitioner:
CHARLES A. CARLSON, III
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Carlson
as 1:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Martin Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Sniezek et al
as 1:2010cv02638
Plaintiff:
John Ferguson
Defendant:
T. R. Sniezek , Russell C. Hendershot , Kim Ask-Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARLSON v. CARMICHAEL et al
as 2:2010cv03579
Plaintiff:
ALLAN ERIC CARLSON
Defendant:
STEVE CARMICHAL, RICHARD BURKE and THREE JOHN DOE UNITED STATES MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
