Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
People Of The State Of New York v. Chambers
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of New York
Defendant:
Koran Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Chambers v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv00931
Petitioner:
Gary Chambers
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paterno v. Arthur M. Cromarty Complex et al
as 2:2023cv04592
Plaintiff:
Michael-John: Paterno
Defendant:
J. Arthur M. Cromarty Complex, Hon Judge Karen M. Wilutis, Riccardo J. Mascio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv03733
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hiram Cano
Defendant:
City of New York, Warden of N.I.C., Deputy Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Toulon et al
as 2:2022cv05463
Plaintiff:
Wayne Chambers
Defendant:
Errol Toulon and New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Lilly
as 1:2022cv04368
Petitioner:
Jashid Chambers
Respondent:
Lynn Lilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez-Diaz v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv03315
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
John Doe, Beard, Monge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Diaz v. John Doe Warden of MCCLNY et al
as 1:2022cv03332
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
John Doe Warden of MCCLNY, Captain Beard, C.O. Monge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hayes et al
as 1:2021cv04560
Plaintiff:
Theodore Johnson
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hayes, Lieutenant Dupree, D.C.T. Skyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
