Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Chan v. Derr et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Defendant:
A. Torres, L. Lazo, S. Keolanui and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher K.Y. Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chan v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Kendrick Tahara, Alexander Lewnard, Rade Vanic and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher K. Y. Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Harmon
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Respondent:
Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry (PS) v. Colorado Housing and Finance Authority et al
as 1:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Channing D. Curry
Defendant:
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority and Bison Title Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01315
Respondent:
Patrick Lechleitner, Christopher LaRose, Merrick Garland and others
Petitioner:
Hau Cheong Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04756
Defendant:
252685 ST LLC, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Complaint THE LLC D/B/A. Xiao Guo Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv05113
Defendant:
United States of America, Chat Mui Chan, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv05209
Defendant:
Chat Mui Chan, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Hang Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackwell v. Scott
as 5:2024hc02126
Respondent:
Matt Scott
Petitioner:
Channing Al-Lamara Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01573
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
