Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chetanand Sewraz v. USA
as 10-13365
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Sewraz v. First Liberty Insurance Corporation
as 3:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sewraz v. Bailey et al
as 3:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
Daniel Scott Bailey, Chesterfield County Police Department, Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chetanand Sewraz v. David Long, Jr.
as 09-6540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LONG, JR., MICHAEL MORCHOWER, ETHICAL INVESTIGATIONS and others
Sewraz v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv14062
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chetanand Sewraz v. Edward Guice
as 08-8173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant, SCOTT BAILEY, Detective, KATHERINE ATKINS, Evidence Technician and others
Chetanand Sewraz v. Nhon Nguyen
as 08-6981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NHON H. NGUYEN, RAHMAN & SCHETTINE, PLC, SCHETTINE & NGUYEN, PLC and others
Sewraz v. Guice et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
Edward Guice, Scott Bailey, Katherine Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewraz v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
Nhon H. Nguyen, Rahman & Schettine, PLC., Schettine & Nguyen, PLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.