Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Fouts v. Cass County Jail, et al
as 24-1068
Plaintiff:
JACOB A. FOUTS
Defendant:
CASS COUNTY JAIL, Indiana, OFFICER TITUS, C.O., OFFICER BIGGS, C.O. and others
ALLEN v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA and FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Elkhart County of Indiana et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angel Flores
Defendant:
Elkhart County of Indiana, Goshen Policy Department, Osterday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKENSON v. CLINTON COUNTY JAIL INDIANA
as 1:2021cv02951
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE DICKENSON
Defendant:
CLINTON COUNTY JAIL INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickenson v. Clinton County Jail Indianan
as 4:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Lee Dickenson
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte County of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael S Bergerson, LaPorte County of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCADO v. SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
as 1:2017cv04330
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAIDEN v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2010cv00766
Defendant:
FRANK L FRITCH, RICHARD L RUSSELL and TIPTON COUNTY OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
JAMES R MAIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maiden v. Menges et al
as 1:2010cv00737
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY OF INDIANA and WILLIAM C MENGES
Plaintiff:
JAMES R MAIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
