Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Lee
as 23-60179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Larry Lee, George Castro, Gabriel Walker and others
Pinkston v. Vital Core Health
as 23-60135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Vital Core Health Strategies, Private Prison Medical Contractor, Individual capacity and Official capacity, Robert T. Brodell, Dermatologist, Individual capacity and Official capacity and Patrick Arnold, Doctor
Pinkston v. MTC
as 23-60133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
MTC, Hector Portillo, Programs Director Becky Turcotte, Director of Programs and others
Pinkston v. Pendleton
as 23-60055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Shunlekee Pendleton, Gabriel Walker, Tate Reeves and others
Pinkston v. Pointe
as 23-60044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeannette Pointe and Premier Supply Link, L.L.C.
Pinkston v. Higginbotham
as 23-60012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Higginbotham and Penny Terrell
v. Pinkston et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Defendant:
Chaz Pinkston, Jeannette Pointe and Premier Supply Link, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Pendleton et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Shunlekee Pendleton, Gabriel Walker, Tate Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinkston v. MTC et al
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
MTC, Hector Portillo, Programs Director Becky Turcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
