Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Davis v. Christopher Brun
as 23-6022
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Berkley v. Christopher Brun
as 23-5866
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY MICHAEL BERKLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
Michael Davis v. Christopher Brun
as 23-5641
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, et al v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., et al
as 22-5789
Plaintiff:
ULTIMATE CAKRA LIBERATION, Tribunal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya and CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, aka Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TROUSDALE TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Sexton, Jr et al v. Core Civic Incorporated of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Hubert G. Sexton, Jr, Dennis Carroll, Billy Hobbs and others
Defendant:
Core Civic Incorporated of Tennessee, Damon Hininger, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00293
Defendant:
f/n/u Crawford, Vincent Vantell, f/n/u Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Carrington Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand , Kevin Cmelik , Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ultimate Cakra Liberation et al v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, Charles Orlando Fields, Robert Birdwell and others
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
