Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Zayas-Cintron v. Hicks, et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Luis Guil Zayas-Cintron
Defendant:
C.O. Hicks, Ms. Goss, C.O. Fieni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO MORRIS, JR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, WARDEN NANCY GIANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spellman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Spellman
Defendant:
John Doe, Chief Grievance Office, GTL Incorporate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CINTRON v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2021cv01140
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CINTRON
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, DAVID PENCHISHEN, BLANE BRANDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2018cv05537
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT JAMEY LUTHER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
LUIS G. ZAYAS CINTRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLMAN v. BEVERLY et al
as 5:2018cv03413
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELLMAN
Defendant:
MR. BEVERLY, MISS CINTRON, MR. HUMBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-CINTRON v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
YARED A. PEREZ-CINTRON
Defendant:
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAM HARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-CINTRON v. HARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
YARED A. PEREZ-CINTRON
Defendant:
ADAM HARDNER, BRIAN FIORELLI, KABASINKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. YANOFF et al
as 2:2016cv02944
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO CINTRON
Defendant:
ADAM YANOFF and LACKS AND ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLMAN v. BEVERLY et al
as 2:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELLMAN
Defendant:
BEVERLY, SHAPARIO, KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
